Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Judicial and constitutional studies examines how courts make decisions, how those decisions interact with public opinion and political power, and how legal institutions maintain—or lose—their independence over time. Scholars in this area treat judges not as neutral arbiters standing apart from society but as actors embedded in political systems, responsive to the same pressures of partisanship, mobilization, and legitimacy that shape other institutions. Central questions include how constitutional review functions when courts depend on elected branches to enforce their rulings, and whether ordinary people's sense of legal entitlement—what researchers call legal consciousness—shapes the kinds of claims that ever reach a court. Active debates concern the conditions under which judicial independence survives democratic backsliding and how international tribunals acquire, or squander, the authority needed to constrain powerful states.
- Works
- 77,006
- Total citations
- 421,774
- Keywords
- Judicial PoliticsLegal ConsciousnessConstitutional ReviewJudicial IndependenceSupreme CourtPublic Opinion
Top papers in Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Ordered by total citation count.
- Between Facts and Norms↗ 4,121
- The Concept of Law↗ 3,630
- Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy↗ 3,603
- Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda↗ 3,065OA
- Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change↗ 2,756
- Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control↗ 2,278
- Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds↗ 2,272OA
- A Theory of the Calculus of Voting↗ 1,945
- Are There Any Natural Rights?↗ 1,892
- Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals↗ 1,888
- A Theory of the Calculus of Voting↗ 1,862
- The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws↗ 1,786
Active researchers
Top authors in this area, ranked by h-index.