Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Judicial and constitutional studies examines how courts acquire and exercise power, how legal institutions shape—and are shaped by—political forces, and how ordinary people come to understand their rights and the law. Scholars in this area investigate questions ranging from what makes judges genuinely independent to how public opinion influences constitutional decisions, and why some groups turn to litigation as a strategy for social change while others do not. A central tension running through the research concerns whether courts can serve as reliable checks on majoritarian politics or whether they ultimately reflect the partisan and cultural conditions that produce them. Active debates include how international and domestic courts interact, under what conditions judicial review strengthens democratic accountability, and how the erosion of judicial norms ripples through broader systems of separated powers.
- Works
- 77,859
- Total citations
- 424,500
- Keywords
- Judicial PoliticsLegal ConsciousnessConstitutional ReviewJudicial IndependenceSupreme CourtPublic Opinion
Top papers in Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Ordered by total citation count.
- Between Facts and Norms↗ 4,121
- The Concept of Law↗ 3,630
- Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy↗ 3,605
- Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda↗ 3,085OA
- Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change↗ 2,766
- Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds↗ 2,309OA
- Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control↗ 2,278
- A Theory of the Calculus of Voting↗ 1,945
- Are There Any Natural Rights?↗ 1,905
- Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals↗ 1,897
- A Theory of the Calculus of Voting↗ 1,872
- The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws↗ 1,787
Active researchers
Top authors in this area, ranked by h-index.