Academic Writing and Publishing
How scientists communicate their work — through research papers, peer review, and citation practices — shapes which ideas gain visibility and which get overlooked. Scholars studying scientific writing and publishing examine everything from how a paper's title influences how often it gets cited, to whether peer review reliably filters for quality or introduces its own distortions. In fast-moving areas like nanoscience, where terminology is still settling and referencing conventions vary widely, these questions have real consequences for how knowledge accumulates and gets attributed. Open debates include how publication incentives affect what researchers choose to study and report, and whether emerging forms of scholarly communication — such as poster sessions or preprint servers — can carry the same epistemic weight as traditional journal articles.
- Works
- 183,639
- Total citations
- 188,731
- Keywords
- Scientific WritingPublicationCitation AccuracyResearch PaperAcademic JournalsTitle Characteristics
Top papers in Academic Writing and Publishing
Ordered by total citation count.
- The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences↗ 14,195
- Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research↗ 11,318
- SAS user's guide↗ 7,221
- Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine↗ 5,147
- The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique↗ 4,957
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement↗ 3,353
- Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences↗ 3,271
- The unpublished manuscript↗ 3,244OA
- Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association↗ 3,200
- A personal communication↗ 3,113OA
- <i>PRISMA2020</i> : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis↗ 2,940OA
- The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?↗ 2,936OA
Active researchers
Top authors in this area, ranked by h-index.