Academic Writing and Publishing
Academic writing and publishing in the history and philosophy of science examines how scientific knowledge is produced, formatted, and validated — from the conventions that shape a research paper's title to the mechanics of peer review that determine what enters the scholarly record. Citation accuracy, journal standards, and emerging areas like nanoscience complicate the picture by revealing how formal publication practices can quietly influence what gets read, credited, and built upon. Researchers in this area are actively asking whether current peer review models reliably filter for quality or merely for conformity, and how small features of scholarly communication — a title's phrasing, a misformatted reference — propagate through the literature in ways that distort the cumulative record of science.
- Works
- 184,576
- Total citations
- 189,615
- Keywords
- Scientific WritingPublicationCitation AccuracyResearch PaperAcademic JournalsTitle Characteristics
Top papers in Academic Writing and Publishing
Ordered by total citation count.
- The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences↗ 14,203
- Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research↗ 11,656
- SAS user's guide↗ 7,221
- Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine↗ 5,147
- The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique↗ 4,968
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement↗ 3,355
- Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences↗ 3,341
- The unpublished manuscript↗ 3,244OA
- Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association↗ 3,200
- <i>PRISMA2020</i> : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis↗ 3,140OA
- A personal communication↗ 3,113OA
- The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?↗ 2,992OA
Active researchers
Top authors in this area, ranked by h-index.